ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 has rampantly spread around the globe and continues to cause unprecedented loss through ongoing waves of (re)infection. Increasing our understanding of the protection against infection with SARS-CoV-2 is critical to ending the pandemic. Serological assays have been widely used to assess immune responses, but secretory antibodies, the essential first line of defense, have been studied to only a limited extent. Of particular interest and importance are neutralizing antibodies, which block the binding of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 to the human receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) and thus are essential for immune defense. Here, we employed Microfluidic Diffusional Sizing (MDS), an immobilization-free technology, to characterize neutralizing antibody affinity to SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) and spike trimer in saliva. Affinity measurement was obtained through a contrived sample and buffer using recombinant SARS-CoV-2 RBD and monoclonal antibody. Limited saliva samples demonstrated that MDS applies to saliva neutralizing antibody measurement. The ability to disrupt a complex of ACE2-Fc and spike trimer is shown. Using a quantitative assay on the patient sample, we determined the affinity and binding site concentration of the neutralizing antibodies.
ABSTRACT
Long COVID-19 (LC-19) is a condition that has affected a high percentage of the population that recovered from the initial disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). LC-19 diagnosis is currently poorly defined because of its variable, multisystem, episodic symptoms, and lack of uniformity in the critical time points associated with the disease. Considering the number of cases, workers' compromised efficiency or inability to return to their duties can affect organizations and impact economies. LC-19 represents a significant burden on multiple levels and effectively reduces quality of life. These factors necessitate the establishment of firm parameters of diagnoses to provide a foundation for ongoing and future studies of clinical characteristics, epidemiology, risk factors, and therapy. In this scoping review, we conducted a literature search across multiple publication sites to identify papers of interest regarding the diagnosis of LC-19. We identified 225 records of interest and categorized them into seven categories. Based on our findings, there are only 11 original papers that outline the diagnostic process in detail with little overlap. This scoping review highlights the lack of consensus regarding the definition and, thereby, the LC-19 diagnosis processes. Due to no clear directive and considering the many unknowns surrounding the natural history of the disease and further recovery/sequelae from COVID-19, continued discussion and agreement on a definition/diagnosis will help future research and management of these patients.
